Ontario truck driver faces $305 fine for smoking in workplace: his truck

Published Thursday October 8th, 2009

TORONTO - The burning question about precisely where a person can smoke these days is flaring up again in Ontario, where a 48-year-old trucker faces a $305 fine for lighting up on the job: while driving his big rig along Canada's busiest highway.

The man, who hails from London, Ont., a two-hour drive southwest of Toronto, was headed for the Ontario border city of Windsor when he was pulled over Wednesday along Highway 401 and given a ticket under the Smoke-Free Ontario Act.

The law, considered a Canadian standard-setter when it was passed in 2006, forbids smoking in all workplaces and enclosed public spaces, including buildings, structures or vehicles worked in or frequented by employees, according to the government's website.

"Examples of an enclosed workplace include the inside of a trailer office on a construction site, the inside of a loading dock, or the inside of a delivery truck," the site says.

Ontario provincial police Const. Shawna Coulter said the law is very explicit about what constitutes a workplace.

"It says the inside of any place, building, structure or vehicle that is part of the employee's workplace, which if you're driving a truck for long periods of time - that becomes your workplace."

The driver, whose name was not immediately released, could have good reason to fight the ticket in court, said Doug Switzer, vice-president of the Ontario Trucking Association.

The provincial law ought not apply in the case of federally regulated trucking companies that operate in other provinces or the United States, Switzer said - nor should it be brought to bear on truckers who own and operate their own rigs and work alone.

"It is a little complicated on the enforcement end because you've got thousands of people from OPP, municipal police forces and health unit enforcement staff, not all of whom are versed in the subtle nuances of the trucking industry or the smoking legislation," Switzer said.

Julie Rosenberg, a spokeswoman for Ontario's Ministry of Health Promotion, refused to comment Thursday on whether or not the law would be applicable in the case of a truck belonging to a federally regulated company.

In the event the driver of the truck did not construe an employee as defined by the legislation, however, "the vehicle in question would not meet the definition of an enclosed workplace," Rosenberg said in an email.

Transportation Minister Jim Bradley said he'd never heard of such a case, and while he couldn't comment on any particular case, said he'll be watching to see how this one unfolds.

"It would be interesting to see how this develops," Bradley said. "That's interesting. It's a new one to me."

Coulter said it was unclear whether the fine was the first of its kind in Ontario. "We don't track specific charges, but I don't know that it's been utilized in the past," she said.

Nonetheless, that's the way the law is supposed to work, said Health Promotion Minister Margarett Best.

"It's about health, and I'm not looking at this from the perspective of whether it's a milestone or not," Best said of the charge. "I'm looking at it from the perspective of being concerned about the health of Ontarians."

Neil MacKenzie, the manager of tobacco programs for the Windsor-Essex County Health Unit, said even a farmer's enclosed tractor would be considered a work environment.

"Whether or not you have the sunroof open or windows down ... it's an enclosed workplace and you're prohibited from smoking in that vehicle," MacKenzie told Windsor radio station CKLW.

Still, no one would march into a field and fine a farmer for smoking in an enclosed tractor, he said.

"Before we take any radical action on it, we'd confirm with the Ministry of Health whether there's precedent," MacKenzie said.

"We'd make sure the farmer understood requirements and give the opportunity for full compliance."

Ontario's Liberal government, first elected in 2003, has been aggressive in its efforts to curb tobacco use in the province. Last summer, the province amended the Highway Traffic Act to prohibit smoking in cars carrying children.

Stringent anti-tobacco laws prohibiting smoking in covered public places and workplaces, like restaurants and bars, are also in effect in a number of other Canadian provinces and territories, including Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Quebec, the Maritime provinces, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.

Last February, a 29-year-old woman from the Sarnia, Ont., area was charged under the ban after she was allegedly found smoking with five young children in the vehicle. Officers said they found both the driver and a 19-year-old female passenger smoking cigarettes.

John Tuckwell, spokesman for Alberta's Health Ministry says technically a trucker could be fined in his province.

Under Alberta legislation, the cab of truck is considered a workplace if the driver is not alone in the rig, says Tuckwell.

But he's not aware of any charges being laid under these circumstances.

Several provinces, meanwhile, plan to join forces against tobacco companies to recover health-care costs related to smoking.

Quebec confirmed earlier this month it was joining Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick in filing a multibillion-dollar lawsuit against tobacco manufacturers.

Ontario's $50-billion lawsuit against three tobacco companies is aimed at recovering the cost of treating smoke-related illnesses dating back as far as 1955.

The provinces began to consider legal action after a 2005 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld British Columbia's right to seek compensation against tobacco companies.

-with files from Allison Jones and Keith Leslie

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

We are getting closer and closer to being a communist country wether anyone wants to admit it or not. This is one of the most foolish things ive read in a long long time. The government steals tons of money from taxing cigarettes which last time I checked are legal and yet they have the police out fining truckers and people driving there cars down the highway for smoking them. This is rediculous and a sad day for Canada to put it lightly. Some truck drivers own there own trucks and pay up to 200 thousand dollars to own it and now our government is gonna tell these guys they cant smoke in them when its actually there HOME for weeks at a time!!!!!
16
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Round Head, Miramichi on 08/10/09 03:52:29 PM AST
Next.....fined for smoking in your own home.
4
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Fred R., Fredericton on 08/10/09 04:14:41 PM AST
Don't the police have better things to do like fight real crime or look for a kidnapped person? What is this country coming too? Smoking has become a crime now...geesh! Shouldn't these officers that are sworn in to uphold the law get after real criminals instead of wasting tax dollars like this?

Honestly??
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Claudia Julien, Grande-Anse, NB on 08/10/09 04:24:36 PM AST
I could understand if his company fined him, but the police?

I also drive a company vehicle and am not allowed to smoke in it and there is a sticker in it saying that I can be prosecuted by the leasing company.

If they are going to fine him, they better start fining cab drivers everyday.
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Anti Gov, Moncton on 08/10/09 04:28:44 PM AST
That is just crazy.
Slow day on the beat, or easy pickings to keep up the numbers?

Is the provincial gov't of Ontario telling these cops what to look for in order to prop up the treasury after blowing 1 billion on their e-health fiasco???

And no, I don't smoke. But if someone is in their truck & on a busy highway at the scheduled break-time, it doesn't make sense for them to pull over & have a smoke outside, then have to start up the truck all over again & wait for traffic etc. to get going. Makes no sense at all.
5
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Julie Laflm, moncton on 08/10/09 05:09:55 PM AST
If the trucking company, as part of its normal business, goes outside Ontario (other provinces or USA) then that company comes under Federal Statute and not Provincial (Canada Labour Code, Part III). Easiest way to find out is to read the Operating License (operating authority), located in the truck ownership package. If this is the case, there is a Federal Statute (Non-Smokers Health Act, Sections 2 and 3.2) that allows the employer to designate smoking areas and rooms, such as a motor vehicle (truck). Look at “Labour Standards in the Federal Jurisdiction Workplace” and it states to whom this applies. I would challenge this one. Then after either defeating the charge or if the charge is withdrawn, I would sue the OPP in both the criminal court for harassment and civil court for damages due to pain and suffering. Then I would take the Province to Court.
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Glen Christiansen, Cambridge on 09/10/09 02:28:01 AM AST
Well it is good to know our highways are so safe no speeding tailgating all the trucks have there speed limiters set that all the O.P.P. have is nothing better to do than ticket someone smoking in his truck. I feel safer now.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Ed. Williams, Kitchener,On on 15/10/09 03:34:22 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles