Canada expects U.S. queries about stability

Published Tuesday December 2nd, 2008

OTTAWA - The whole world is watching and our closest ally - the United States - is worried as Canada goes through a "constitutional psychodrama," Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Tuesday.

Click to Enlarge
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Tom Hanson
Prime Minister Stephen Harper receives a standing ovation from Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Foreign Affairs minister Lawrence Cannon, Environment minister Jim Prentice, Defence minister Peter MacKay (left to right) and other caucus members during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament in Ottawa Tuesday Dec. 2, 2008.

Cannon told the Commons he expected president-elect Barack Obama's nominee for secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, to ask about the stability of Canada's government. He is hoping to have his first conversation with Clinton on Wednesday.

"Is there someone in this chamber who thinks that our most important commercial partner and our most faithful ally is not worried about what is going on?" he asked.

The Bush administration's envoy to Canada, Ambassador David Wilkins, said he was watching the tempest, but not unduly unnerved by it.

Wilkins said he hasn't spoken to the White House about the crisis and didn't know if he would raise the issue during a farewell visit with President George W. Bush later this week.

"Cables go down to the State Department on current events," he said in Regina. "I'm sure cables have gone down on this."

Cannon said the scenario of an NDP-Liberal coalition supported by the Bloc Quebecois replacing Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives is befuddling to the international community.

"This, Mr. Speaker, is not a scenario that is easy to explain to our allies and our partners who are striving mightily to achieve economic prosperity through political stability."

But if our allies were seeking explanations of the contretemps, few were willing to say so.

A spokesperson for the Queen would not go anywhere near the issue, refusing to say if Canada's head of state was paying attention to what was going on in its former colony.

"I've spoken to the people on our side and the only line I can give you is that this is all a matter for the Canadian government," said a spokeswoman for Buckingham Palace.

Canada is forging deep ties with Afghanistan, where 2,500 Canadian troops are fighting a Taliban insurgency. Two of the parties that would toss out the Conservatives have called for those troops to be immediately withdrawn.

But a representative of the Afghanistan embassy said the ambassador refused to comment.

The French embassy is also closely watching the unprecedented developments in Ottawa, according an embassy spokesman.

But the embassy's press counsellor Jean-Christophe Fleury would not comment further.

"We have to remain neutral when it comes to all political developments in Canada," he said.

Cannon suggested that foreign investors who are choosing where to invest internationally may be hesitant to do so in Canada as a result of the country's uncertain political future.

"Put yourself in the place of a foreign investor wondering which among many countries might provide the best return," Cannon said.

Jacqueline Best, a specialist in international political economy at the University of Ottawa, disagreed.

The coalition has promised an economic stimulus package that includes infrastructure spending, home construction, renovations and financial support for "struggling sectors" that can demonstrate a viable business plan.

"I think that will make up for any short-term uncertainties that the market can have," Best said.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been encouraging countries to take action to prevent a worldwide recession, said Best.

"What the coalition is proposing is more in line with the global norms than what Harper was initially proposing," she said.

"It's the same kind of policies the International Monetary Fund is taking."

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Actually this is all political rhetoric and posturing. The Conservatives trying to spread the blame by insinuating that the international community is distressed over this. Is there no end to how low Harper and his cronies will go?
10
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
D A, Saint John on 03/12/08 10:56:58 AM AST
Its not so funny for Harper when the shoe is on the other foot. He led a no confidence vote to oust the liberals when martin was running it. Harper seems to want to run parliament like a dictatorship by shutting down parliament until the new year so that the vote wont happen. Grow up Harper, What goes around, comes back to bite you in the a$$.
9
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Robert B., Saint John on 03/12/08 11:40:36 AM AST
Mr.Parizeau, a leading separatist hardliner, has been quoted in the Montreal Journal (Journal de Montréal) as saying that, and I must translate, "this is a victory for the Bloc and the separatist are smiling".

5
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Kevin R. Crawford, Royalton on 03/12/08 12:54:37 PM AST
I think that both sides have some blame here, but what the Coalition is trying to do is terrible. They are not thinking about the average Canadian and whether or not this will help the country, they are only thinking about themselves and their dislike of Mr Harper. This is precisely why people don't trust any politician.
2
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
S. Anonymous, Saint John on 03/12/08 04:12:23 PM AST
The only way that Harper will not be defeated at the end of January is if the coalition falls apart. It was probably because the coalition was in its early stages, and risked falling apart, that the Governor General decided that Harper probably, temporarily, had the best chance of maintaining confidence. As long as the colalition is together, no foreign head of state or business investor can trust that Harper will be PM in February. So this little vacation is the worst thing our government could have done to encourage investment in Canada. We should have settled the matter, one way or another, now, instead of going on an early vacation.
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
A M, Saint John on 05/12/08 05:30:12 PM AST
Kevin R. Crawford, Royalton, you quoted that you read a statement by Jacques Parizeau in the "Journal de Montreal"? Are you sure about that Sir? Would you be kind enough to share the website link you read it on? If not could you at the very least name the reporter who wrote it? As a matter of fact I just read what you claim on Conservative MP Steven Fletcher's and the University of Alberta websites but couldn't find anywhere else, not even on the Journal de Montreal website. The only thing I read that even comes close to your quote was that he endorsed Gille Ducceppe's decision to backup the coalition for a couple of years.
2
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
B. Durelle, Baie Ste Anne, NB on 06/12/08 12:36:46 AM AST
Cannon expects to be asked about the situation. So nobody's actually went so far as to actually ask a question? What a crisis. It soon might be actually reported in the US that the previous Canadian government which lead Canada to a string of surpluses with good relations with the US might lead a coalition gov't to power in Canada. And imagine the uproar is Germany's coalition government found out that the Canadians were blatently stealing the concept of coalition governments from all the coalition governments in Europe. It might start WW3.

0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
JOHNNY QUINN, MONCTON on 09/12/08 01:36:32 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles